Home / Settlement Tax Planning / The Plaintiff Double Tax Trap Explained (And How To Avoid It)

The Plaintiff Double Tax Trap Explained (And How To Avoid It)

Key Takeaways

  • The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act eliminated the miscellaneous itemized deduction for attorney fees in many cases.
  • Plaintiffs may be taxed on the gross recovery, including amounts paid to attorneys.
  • This change creates a double tax burden where attorney fees are taxed but not deductible.
  • Advance planning is required to mitigate adverse tax consequences for plaintiffs.

Meet the Author

Greg Maxwell, Esq. CFP®

Greg Maxwell is an attorney, Certified Financial Planner, and settlement planner. He specializes in settlement tax planning, government benefits planning, and financial planning for plaintiffs and plaintiff attorneys.

Are You or Your Client Receiving a Settlement Soon?

Book a free 15-minute call to review settlement planning options and help make sure you or your client make the most of the settlement.

Book a FREE call today to start your tax strategy & financial planning with settlement experts. Avoid costly mistakes, reduce taxes, and make the most of your settlement.

Book a FREE call today to start your tax strategy & financial planning with settlement experts.

Introduction

The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA) of 2017 had a significant impact on plaintiffs receiving taxable settlements. Prior to this change in the law, plaintiffs could list their attorney's fees as a deduction on their tax returns, avoiding paying tax on the attorney fee portion. However, the TCJA changed this. Now, individual plaintiffs cannot claim a deduction for attorney's fees except in limited circumstances, resulting in plaintiffs paying taxes on the entire gross recovery, including 100% of their attorney's fees. This double taxation of attorney's fees is known as the Plaintiff Double Tax Trap.

What Causes the Plaintiff Double Tax Trap?

At its core, the double tax trap comes from two things: how settlements are reported and changes in tax rules. First, many settlements are reported as income to the plaintiff. Then the plaintiff pays the attorney out of that money. Under older rules, the plaintiff could often deduct attorney fees. But the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act changed that. It suspended many itemized deductions, including the deduction for attorney fees in most cases. That means the full settlement looks like taxable income. The plaintiff pays tax on it. The attorney also reports the fee as income and pays tax. In effect, the money is taxed twice.

Other causes that trigger this trap are settlement structure and wording. If an agreement reports the settlement as a “gross” payment to the plaintiff, it often forces the plaintiff to report the full amount as income. If the defendant pays the attorney directly or the settlement is structured as a net payment to the plaintiff, the double taxation risk can be much lower. The way damages are allocated in the settlement (for medical bills, lost wages, punitive damages, emotional distress, etc.) also matters. Some types of damages are taxed differently, and a clear allocation can help reduce taxes.

How Lawsuit Settlements Are Typically Taxed

Not every settlement is taxed the same way. Here are the common rules in plain language:

  • Physical injury or sickness: Amounts received because of physical injury or physical sickness are usually tax-free. This includes money for medical bills and physical pain. The law that governs this exclusion is often called Section 104(a)(2). If your settlement pays for a physical injury, that part is generally not taxable.
  • Emotional distress and non-physical injuries: Money for emotional distress or reputational harm is usually taxable. If you did not suffer a physical injury, the award is often treated as taxable income.
  • Punitive damages: These are almost always taxable. Punitive damages punish the defendant. The IRS treats them as ordinary income.
  • Interest and lost wages: Interest that accrues on the settlement and wages that would have been taxable are generally taxable.
  • Attorney fees: Attorneys report the fees they receive as income. How the plaintiff reports attorney fees depends on how the settlement is written and on current tax rules. Since the TCJA, many plaintiffs cannot deduct attorney fees as before. This is a key reason the double tax trap appears.

The Plaintiff Double Tax Trap

To better understand the impact of the Plaintiff Double Tax Trap, let's walk through an example. Let’s say there is a $10 million gross settlement for a plaintiff with a taxable damages case. $4 million goes to attorney's fees, and $6 million goes to the plaintiff. After the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, the plaintiff pays tax on the entire $10 million, even though the plaintiff only received $6 million. In addition, the attorney also pays taxes on the $4 million of attorney's fees they receive, resulting in the attorney's fee portion being effectively taxed twice and the plaintiff effectively taxed twice as well.

As a result, plaintiffs often find that they only receive five to 20% of the total settlement after paying taxes. To illustrate this, let's assume a 40% contingent legal fee, and the plaintiff's tax rate is 40%. This means that 40% of the $10 million will go to legal fees, and another 40% of the $10 million will be paid by the plaintiff in taxes. The plaintiff has to pay taxes on the full $10 million gross recovery at a 40% tax rate, leaving only $2 million or 20% for the plaintiff as their net recovery.

Use our Settlement tax calculator to estimate the tax impact on your specific settlement and see how much you'll actually keep after taxes.

Other resources you might find helpful:

How the Big Beautiful Bill Affects Plaintiff Settlement Taxation

The One Big Beautiful Bill, signed into law on July 4, 2025, is a separate law from the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 (TCJA). The TCJA eliminated miscellaneous itemized deductions subject to the 2% floor beginning in 2018, so attorney fees that used to be deducted as miscellaneous itemized deductions are no longer deductible. The One Big Beautiful Bill made that elimination permanent, so plaintiffs should not expect the deduction to return. This means plaintiffs often cannot lower their taxable income by the amount of attorney fees they pay.

Before the TCJA, plaintiffs in many cases could claim a deduction for attorney fees and costs. That made the net taxable recovery smaller. After the TCJA, that route closed for most plaintiffs. That rule change is the main reason the Plaintiff Double Tax Trap is now common. The TCJA did not change who must report the attorney’s income — attorneys still report fees as income. The combination of those two facts—plaintiff reports full recovery, attorney reports fee income—creates the double tax outcome.

Common Settlement Scenarios That Trigger Double Taxation

Some settlement situations are more likely to cause double taxation. Watch for these:

  • Gross settlements with a contingency fee: The defendant pays the full amount to the plaintiff. The plaintiff then pays the attorney. The plaintiff reports the whole amount as income. With no deduction, double taxation can occur.
  • No allocation in the settlement agreement: When the settlement lumps damages together, the plaintiff loses the chance to show part of the award is tax-free, like a physical injury award.
  • Awards that include punitive damages or emotional distress: These categories are taxable. If the plaintiff is taxed on them and the attorney reports their fee, the total tax paid can become very high.
  • Interest and post-judgment amounts: Interest added to a judgment or settlement is usually taxable to the plaintiff.
  • State tax rules: Some states tax settlements differently. State taxes can add another layer of tax and make the trap worse.
  • Lack of a Qualified Settlement Fund or trust: Without an appropriate fund or trust, there may be no mechanism to allocate income or to have the defendant pay attorney fees directly.

How Proper Settlement Planning Prevents the Double Tax Trap

Good settlement tax planning starts before you sign anything. Plaintiffs and attorneys should plan the deal together with a tax adviser or settlement planner. Here are key planning steps that help prevent double taxation.

  • Negotiate net settlements or direct payment of fees. Ask the defendant to pay your attorney directly or to structure payments so the plaintiff receives a net amount. If the defendant pays the attorney directly, the plaintiff might not have to report the fees as income.
  • Get clear allocation in the release. Draft the agreement to show what part of the settlement is for physical injury, what part is for lost wages, and what part is punitive. Clear language helps support tax treatment.
  • Use a Qualified Settlement Fund. A QSF can hold funds and distribute payments by category, and if set up correctly it can reduce immediate tax risk, protect public benefits, and help manage how and when funds are paid to beneficiaries.
  • Consider structured settlements. An annuity can spread taxable income over many years. Structured settlements are common in personal injury cases and can help manage taxes and cash flow.
  • Use tax gross-up clauses if necessary. If the defendant refuses to pay fees directly, ask for a tax gross-up. This means the defendant adds enough money so the plaintiff can pay their tax and still pay the attorney.
  • Coordinate with a settlement planner and services like attorney fee deferrals or the Attorney feeSaver. These tools can help plaintiffs and attorneys manage tax timing. Deferrals and specialized products can keep taxes lower in the long run.

Tax Planning Strategies to Reduce the Plaintiff’s Taxes

Here are practical strategies plaintiffs and attorneys can use during settlement tax planning.

  • Negotiate payment flow: Ask the defendant to pay attorney fees directly. If the defendant makes the attorney whole, the plaintiff may avoid reporting the attorney portion as taxable income. This simple change can prevent the double tax trap. Make this a clear term in the settlement.
  • Allocate damages carefully: Have the settlement specify amounts for medical expenses, lost wages, emotional distress, and punitive damages. Allocations that reflect real facts are persuasive to the IRS. If a portion is for physical injury, it can be tax-free. A clear allocation reduces the chance the IRS treats all money as taxable.
  • Use pre-settlement tax planning: The right structure, arranged before settlement, can hold proceeds and control distributions, protect public benefits, and support careful tax timing. These strategies require proper setup to avoid creating new tax problems, so work with a settlement planner to put one in place correctly.
  • Consider a Qualified Settlement Fund (QSF): A QSF lets a third-party trustee receive and manage settlement funds. It can be used to pay claimants and attorneys and may delay when taxes are due. QSFs require IRS rules compliance and good accounting. If done right, they can limit tax surprises.
  • Structure payments as an annuity: Structured settlements (annuities) convert a lump sum into a stream of payments. This can reduce immediate income and lower taxes in high tax years. Structured settlements are especially useful in personal injury cases where tax-free treatment already applies to the injury portion.
  • Ask for a tax gross-up: If the defendant will not pay attorney fees directly, ask them to “gross up” the award. A gross-up adds extra money so the plaintiff can cover taxes and still pay the attorney. This shifts tax responsibility back toward the defendant.
  • Pre-settlement tax planning with a CPA: Get tax advice before you sign. A CPA can run numbers and recommend the best structure. Small changes in wording or payment flow can save thousands in tax. Tax planning should be part of settlement talks from the start.
  • Use attorney fee deferrals and Attorney feeSaver services: Some services let attorney fees be deferred or managed in a tax-smart way. Attorney feeSaver and similar programs help attorneys and plaintiffs preserve cash flow and control tax timing. Ask your attorney if these tools fit your case.

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)

Is The Plaintiff Double Tax Trap a Recent IRS Enforcement Trend?

It is not a brand-new IRS policy, but the trap became much more common after the TCJA in 2017. The suspension of many itemized deductions made it harder for plaintiffs to deduct attorney fees. That change increased the number of plaintiffs who end up taxed on the full recovery while their attorneys also pay tax on fees. The IRS enforces tax law consistently, so the best protection is good settlement tax planning.

Can State Taxes Make The Double Tax Trap Worse For Plaintiffs?

Yes. State tax rules vary. Some states follow federal tax treatment closely. Others have different rules for settlements. A plaintiff may pay federal tax on a recovery and also owe state income tax. State tax can raise the total tax bill significantly. Always check state law when planning settlement taxation.

Are Punitive Damages Always Subject to Double Taxation Risks?

Punitive damages are almost always taxable. Whether they cause “double” taxation depends on how the fees are paid and whether the plaintiff can deduct attorney fees. If the plaintiff is taxed on punitive damages and cannot deduct attorney fees, and the attorney also pays tax on their fee, the total tax burden rises. So punitive damages often increase the risk of a double tax result.

How Much Taxes Do You Pay on Lawsuit Settlements?

That depends on the type of damages, your tax bracket, and the settlement structure. If the recovery is for physical injury and properly allocated, that portion can be tax-free. If the recovery is taxable (emotional distress, punitive damages, lost wages), you will pay income tax based on your tax bracket. Remember that interest and certain other components may also be taxable. Because each case is different, a CPA should run the numbers before you sign the agreement.

Conclusion

The Plaintiff Double Tax Trap can turn a hard-won recovery into a bigger tax bill than you expect. The main causes are settlement structure and changes from the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act that limited deductions for attorney fees. Good settlement tax planning can prevent or reduce the trap. Key tools include negotiating direct payment of attorney fees, clear allocation of damages, a Qualified Settlement Fund, structured settlements, and working with a CPA.

If you are negotiating a settlement, do not treat taxes as an afterthought. Ask your attorney to involve a tax adviser early. Small changes in wording and payment flow can save large amounts in tax. With the right planning, you can keep more of your recovery and avoid the double tax outcome.

For help with settlement tax planning or attorney fee strategies like Attorney feeSaver, speak to a qualified settlement planner and your tax adviser before you settle.

You May Also Like...